# tantrasara-a11 tsa11-p02 (11.3-11.3)

tantrasara-a11 tsa11-p02 (11.3-11.3) passes link checks; no formal theorems bound. Chunk gate passes; no witness verified.

> Machine rendering — UNREVIEWED, not an approved translation. No English here was human-reviewed.

Canonical: https://svatantrya.net/claim/tantrasara-a11/tsa11-p02/

## Passage (excerpt as hashed)

```
tatra kecit āhuḥ jñānābhāvāt ajñānamūlaḥ saṃsāraḥ tadapagame jñānodayāt śaktipāta iti teṣāṃ samyak jñānodaya eva vikṛta iti vācyam karmajanyatve karmaphalavat bhogatvaprasaṅge bhogini ca śaktipātābhyupagatau atiprasaṅgaḥ īśvarecchānimittatve tu jñānodayasya anyonyāśrayatā vaiyarthyaṃ ca īśvare rāgādiprasaṅgaḥ viruddhayoḥ karmaṇoḥ samabalayoḥ anyonyapratibandhe karmasāmyaṃ tataḥ śaktipāta iti cet na kramikatve virodhāyogāt virodhe 'pi anyasya aviruddhasya karmaṇo bhogadānaprasaṅgāt aviruddhakarmāpravṛttau tadaiva dehapātaprasaṅgāt jātyāyuṣpradaṃ karma na pratibadhyate bhogapradam eva tu pratibadhyate iti cet kutaḥ tatkarmasadbhāve yadi śaktiḥ patet tarhi sā bhogapradāt kiṃ bibhiyāt // abhts_11.3
```

## Reading (machine draft, verse-mapped)

**tsa-a11-v03** — Therein some say: from absence of knowledge, saṃsāra rooted in ignorance; from its departure's knowledge-arising, power-descent. To them: knowledge-arising alone is distorted — to be said. If act-produced, [it behaves] like act-fruit; in enjoyment-ness, in the enjoymenter too — the two possibilities of power-descent are excessive consequence. In being-caused-by-the-Lord's-will, however: knowledge-arising's mutual-dependence and futility; in the Lord, passion-and-rest-issue. Of two contradictory acts of equal force, mutual-obstruction: act-equivalence — then power-descent? No: in being-sequential, from impossibility-of-contradiction; even in contradiction, of the uncontradicted act's enjoyment-giving issue — in non-contradicted act's non-occurrence, just-then body-death issue: birth-and-lifespan-giving act is not obstructed; enjoyment-giving is. If asked why: in that-act's-presence, if power might-fall, then she — of the enjoyment-giver — why would she fear?

## Claims

| Claim | Status | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Link completeness | PASS | assurance.trace_links_present + gaps |
| Human review | UNREVIEWED (machine rendering; no human sign-off) | assurance.review |
| Deterministic chunk gate | PASS (none) | proofs.chunk_gate |
| Manuscript witness | UNPINNED (0 verified corpus-wide) | identity.witness |
| Source-span completeness | UNKNOWN | assurance: ledger span is an excerpt; volume not hashed |